Statement made by Justice Minister, Edward Argar
Link: Edward Argar makes statement on Victims Strategy
Source: Parliamentary News
Statement made by Justice Minister, Edward Argar
Link: Edward Argar makes statement on Victims Strategy
Source: Parliamentary News
Statement to be made by Justice Minister, Edward Argar
Link: Edward Argar to make a statement on Victims Strategy
Source: Parliamentary News
Stephen Doughty MP to ask an urgent question on Idlib, Syria
Link: Stephen Doughty MP to question the Government on Idlib, Syria
Source: Parliamentary News
EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee writes to Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Link: Committee raise concerns over high volume of late payments
Source: Parliamentary News
These Regulations make amendments and modifications to the existing regime for the licensing of petroleum consequent on sections 3 and 23 of, and Schedules 1 and 6 to, the Wales Act 2017 (c. 4) (“the 2017 Act”), which devolve legislative competence to the Welsh Assembly and transfer certain functions and powers to the Welsh Ministers for the granting and regulation of licences to search and bore for and get petroleum within the “Welsh onshore area” (as defined in section 23 of that Act), and related matters.
Link: The Scotland Act 2016, Wales Act 2017 and Onshore Petroleum (Consequential, Transitional and Saving Provisions and Model Clauses) Regulations 2018
Source: Legislation .gov.uk
This Order amends the Income-related Benefits (Subsidy to Authorities) Order 1998 (S.I. 1998/562) (“the 1998 Order”) which provides for the calculation and payment of housing benefit subsidy to local authorities in England, Wales and Scotland which administer housing benefit. Section 140F(2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (c.5) authorises the making, revocation or varying of an Order before, during or after the year to which it relates.
Link: The Income-related Benefits (Subsidy to Authorities) Amendment Order 2018
Source: Legislation .gov.uk
A charity originally set up to establish memorials to D-Day veterans, and which now supports former members of the armed forces, has been successfully reconstructed as a result of a Charity Commission inquiry that facilitated the appointment of new trustees.
The Commission’s existing engagement with The Veterans Charity escalated to a formal inquiry in April 2015, after three individuals connected to the charity, including the chief executive, were arrested by British Transport Police over concerns about the charity’s fundraising practices. The publication of the report was delayed as the Commission awaited the outcome of the trial of the charity’s chief executive for charges of theft and fraud by abuse of position; that trial ended when the judge ordered the jury to find him not guilty due to a lack of evidence.
The Commission used its powers on opening the inquiry to safeguard the charity’s assets by freezing the bank accounts; while that freezing order was in place, the regulator monitored and authorised all of the charity’s expenditure, ensuring that each transaction was necessary and a proper application of the charity’s funds. It also exercised other statutory powers to ensure that funds collected from the public in particular through an annual event known as The Forces March were adequately protected while reconstruction took place.
During the early stages of the inquiry, the Commission identified a number of shortcomings in the charity’s administration, including that the charity’s finances were under the sole control of the chief executive, with limited oversight by the trustees. For a significant period of time the chief executive had sole control of the charity’s bank accounts, including its cheque book, debit card and online banking facility.
The inquiry found that nearly £38,000 of the charity’s expenditure had been withdrawn as cash during the period between January 2010 and May 2015, equating to over £500 each month. The inquiry was informed by the charity that the invoices for expenditure before 2013 were lost as a result of an office move. The inquiry was advised that cash withdrawals were used to repay subsistence claims for expenditure on charity business including accommodation, fuel, event costs such as the purchase of stocks, and support for beneficiaries. However there was very little supporting documentary evidence to confirm how these charitable funds had been applied.
In a report published today, the regulator concludes that the trustees of the charity at the time the inquiry opened were responsible for mismanagement in the administration of the charity, after failing to properly oversee the charity’s chief executive or implement effective financial controls or maintain adequate financial records.
Notwithstanding these concerns, the inquiry was satisfied as a result of its investigative work that the charity was undertaking work to provide urgent short term support for veterans in need. It therefore sought volunteers from the charity sector to assist in the charity’s reconstruction. Three people stepped forward to help – two of whom remain as trustees today.
The Commission revoked its protective measures in early 2016 following the strengthening of the charity’s governance and financial controls. The Commission is satisfied that its original regulatory concerns have been addressed following a further inspection of records and meeting with the trustees.
This charity has undertaken valuable work to support veterans in urgent short term need, and our report acknowledges the new trustees’ contribution to the reconstruction of this charity. This is a collaborative model with sector professionals which we would like to see further developed to assist the reconstruction of certain charities which are in difficulty.
The charity’s work prior to this reconstruction was undermined by poor management on the part of the charity’s trustees at the time. This was a charity without adequate systems and controls in place, and limited oversight of the chief executive by the trustees. This is unacceptable, and we are critical of the trustees at that time for their failings.
When the public give to charity, they have a right to expect that their donations will be carefully managed, and be applied solely in furtherance of the charity’s aims. Trustees may hand day-to-day operations to staff – but they must retain oversight, and ultimately, they are always responsible for everything that happens in their charity.
I am grateful, especially to the new trustees, for their hard work in turning the charity around, and ensuring its processes and systems are strengthened so that the charity’s work can continue.
The investigation concludes with the publication of this report. The full report is available on gov.uk.
Email
pressenquiries@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
Press enquiries – office hours
0300 065 2123
Press enquiries – out of hours
07785 748787
Link: Press release: Military charity successfully reconstructed as a result of charity regulator’s inquiry
Source: Gov Press Releases
These Regulations amend the Riot Compensation Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/371) which implement the Riot Compensation Act 2016 (c.8) (“the Act”).
Link: The Riot Compensation (Amendment) Regulations 2018
Source: Legislation .gov.uk
These Regulations bring into force section 35 of the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 (“the Act”).
Link: The Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 (Commencement No. 1 and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2018
Source: Legislation .gov.uk
At around 13:29 hrs on 15 December 2017, an empty pushchair became trapped on the outside of a tram at Radford Road tram stop, Nottingham, when its plastic rain cover was caught between closing doors. It was then dragged to the next tram stop where it was crushed against the kerb. Nobody was physically injured.
A passenger had pushed the pushchair off the tram as the doors were closing because she wished to remain with another passenger who had been removed from the tram by a Nottingham Trams’ travel officer. The rain cover was too thin to trigger the system which automatically reopens the doors if an obstacle is detected. The final visual door check, which drivers are required to carry out before departing from a tram stop, did not result in the driver being aware that the pushchair, shown as a small object on a CCTV monitor in his cab, was in an unsafe position. A larger image of the pushchair was not available to the driver when doing this check because of a modification to the tram’s CCTV system. The travel officer and other staff at the tram stop were unable to stop the tram departing, and the tram driver remained unaware of the pushchair until he arrived at the next tram stop.
Inadequate risk assessment by Nottingham Trams is the probable underlying cause for its staff placing inappropriate reliance on the doors closed indication, being unaware of the importance of the final door visual check, and the way in which the tram CCTV arrangements were modified. The incident also showed that training of travel officers was inadequate.
The RAIB investigation has resulted in two recommendations, both addressed to Nottingham Trams, and one learning point. The first recommendation seeks improved arrangements for preventing trap and drag events. The second requires improvements to Nottingham Trams’ risk assessment processes. The learning point reminds all tram drivers that they must carry out a thorough final door visual check, and not rely solely on doors closed indications, when deciding whether it is safe for their tram to depart.
“Since it was set up in 2005, RAIB has investigated 13 events in which door systems have not detected objects trapped in the closed and locked doors of a departing train or tram. In many cases, a limb or item of clothing has been caught in the doors and the people involved have been injured. This incident was different – it was just an empty pushchair that was pulled along outside a tram from one tram stop to the next. However, it is easy to imagine how serious the consequences might have been if there had been a child in the pushchair.
“Our investigation found that the tramway operator did not fully understand the hazards at the platform-tram interface, and the measures needed to control those hazards. The tram, delivered in 2014, had originally been designed with exterior cameras that gave the driver views from front and back platform-side cameras along the whole length of the tram until after moving off. This had been modified by the tram operator in such a way that the rear CCTV camera view was not available to the driver once the doors closed (and this was how the rest of the trams in Nottingham had operated since the tramway opened in 2004). This modification reduced the quality of the view of the platform-tram interface, and could encourage an incomplete check when making the final decision to move off.
“Once again our investigators encountered a driver who thought that door safety systems would always prevent him taking power if any object was trapped in the closed doors; he was unaware that small objects may not be detected by the door safety system. Worryingly, this misconception was shared by other, more senior members of staff at Nottingham Trams. An incident at Bury on the Manchester Metrolink system described in our safety digest D08/2018, demonstrates that the same belief exists on other tram systems.
“This incident reinforces that absolute importance of the final safety check after the doors are detected as closed and before a tram or train continues with its journey. I must stress that this important safety message applies equally to trams and trains.
“We are recommending that Nottingham Trams takes action to improve safety around the platform-tram interface, as well as reviewing its general assessment of the risk from tram operations. This operator, and others in the UK tram industry, need to be aware of the hazards associated with passengers getting on and off trams, and the ways in which safety can be improved in this area.”
![]()
Link: Press release: Report 15/2018: Pushchair trapped in tram doors and dragged, Nottingham
Source: Gov Press Releases