Foreign Affairs Committee questions Minister on how the Commonwealth features post-Brexit
Link: Minister questioned on Commonwealth Summit
Source: Parliamentary News
Foreign Affairs Committee questions Minister on how the Commonwealth features post-Brexit
Link: Minister questioned on Commonwealth Summit
Source: Parliamentary News
Welsh Affairs Committee examines options for future trading relationships
Link: Welsh academics discuss impact of Brexit on trade
Source: Parliamentary News
Around £1 million of funds have been made available for charity as a result of the Charity Commission’s engagement with a grant-making charity.
In an inquiry report published today, the regulator outlines how governance failings resulted in unauthorised payments totalling approximately £650,000 to three trustees who were acting as consultants for the charity’s wholly owned subsidiary limited company.
The Commission opened its inquiry in February 2017 after newly appointed solicitors sought the current and former trustees’ relief from liability for the unauthorised payments, as well as permission to sell 99% of its shares in the subsidiary limited company.
The inquiry looked into the administration, governance and management of the charity, specifically regarding decision making and conflicts of interest; whether the proposed sale was in the best interests of the charity; whether there had been any private benefit to the current and former trustees; and whether restitution of funds was necessary.
The inquiry found that the consultants were conflicted as they had been trustees of the charity at the time of the payments, and had failed to identify or adequately manage this conflict of interest. The trustees were also unable to demonstrate that adequate records of their decisions had been maintained.
The inquiry considered the payments amounted to significant private advantage and financial benefit, as well as a direct breach of the charity’s governing document and the trustees’ legal duties. The trustees were also in violation of company law which requires them, as directors, to ensure records of their decisions are retained for at least 10years.
Although the inquiry recognised that the trustees had made “honest mistakes”, there was a strict prohibition against private benefit in the governing document. The Commission therefore engaged further and the trustees agreed to seek recovery of the £650,000 and adopt a formal conflicts of interest policy.
After reviewing the charity’s records the Commission was satisfied that the trustees had correctly managed conflicts of interest around the sale of the shares; the conflicted trustees had been removed from decision making and a new independent trustee appointed. The trustees had also sought independent professional advice and negotiated better terms to ensure that the sale was in the charity’s best interest.
The Commission therefore granted consent under s105 and s201 of the Charities Act to authorise the transaction, resulting in a further £350,000 going to the charity.
The inquiry remained open to ensure that the repayment took place, and was closed on 20 February with the publication of this report.
Actively managing conflicts of interest is a fundamental principle of trustee decision making. We recognise that trustees are human beings who may make honest mistakes, but the bottom line is that you must always act in the best interests of your charity.
Our intervention has allowed this charity to claw back a significant amount of money that can now go to charitable causes. I hope this will encourage other charities to be mindful of their duties and consult our guidance when making important decisions.
The Commission’s full report of its inquiry is available on GOV.UK.
Email
pressenquiries@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
Press enquiries – office hours
0300 065 2123
Press enquiries – out of hours
07785 748787
Link: Press release: £1 million of charity funds returned after Commission inquiry
Source: Gov Press Releases
Education Secretary expected to make a statement at around 6pm
Link: Statement on review of post-18 education and funding
Source: Parliamentary News
Karen Bradley expected to make a statement at 4.15pm
Link: Statement: Northern Ireland update
Source: Parliamentary News
Question expected at 3.30pm in the House of Commons
Link: Urgent Question on the case of Alfie Dingley
Source: Parliamentary News
Committee publishes Government response on long term sustainabilty of NHS
Link: Government response on the Long-term Sustainability of the NHS published
Source: Parliamentary News
A man has been ordered to pay more than £7,000 in fines, compensation and costs after he admitted leaving mixed commercial waste on land owned by Thurrock Council.
Billy Prince illegally dumped the waste at a compound located on land at Stanford Road, Stanford-le-Hope, Essex in May 2015.
The compound is used to store street cleaning and highways team equipment and is not an authorised waste collection facility or site permitted for authorised waste disposal.
On 11 May 2015, Prince used a vehicle owned by his employer to unlawfully deposit a quantity of mixed commercial waste at the compound.
CCTV showed a vehicle which was later found to have been driven by Prince depositing waste at the site.
There was a large yellow sign at the compound entrance that stated ‘No Tipping’.
The Environment Agency investigated the incident and determined that the offending was deliberate and undermined legitimate waste management activities. The offending caused inconvenience to the council and clean-up costs.
Prince was sentenced at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court last week. The court heard Prince had pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity and was ‘very remorseful’ of his actions, having lost his job as a result.
He was fined £2,000, ordered to pay compensation to Thurrock Council to the value of £3,970, costs of £1,105 and a victim surcharge of £120.
Environment Agency Enforcement Team Leader Lesley Robertson said she was pleased with the sentencing outcome, and it showed that the courts were taking such incidents seriously. She said:
A community order or custody, as well as a financial penalty, could have been imposed. As this was a single offence the penalty was reduced and the magistrates felt a financial penalty, which totalled more than £7,000, was appropriate.
This shows that even with a single fly tip the penalties are very high.
Link: Press release: Stanford-le-Hope man fined over £7,000 for fly-tipping
Source: Environment Agency
Home Affairs Committee hears from campaigners and UK press regulators
Link: Committee takes evidence on anti-Muslim sentiments in the print media
Source: Parliamentary News
Sarah Clarke takes up seat in Black Rod’s box
Link: New Black Rod starts chamber duties
Source: Parliamentary News